Generic Solution Architecture Design of Regulatory Technology (RegTech)

Benny Firmansyah, Arry Akhmad Arman

Abstract


Regulatory Technology, or RegTech, uses new technology that assists the financial industry, such as FinTech and banks, in meeting regulatory compliance. RegTech automates various regulatory compliance activities that were previously manual, such as regulatory interpretation and regulatory reporting, amidst the challenges of the increasing volume of regulations and operational data. Some cutting-edge technologies discovered at RegTech include big data analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation, and cloud computing. Although very dominant in the financial industry, RegTech solutions have the potential to be applied in other regulated industries besides finance. Several studies have explored the potential for applying RegTech in industries other than finance, such as charitable organizations, real estate marketplace, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare. Therefore, this study aims to design a generic RegTech solution architecture so that it can be adopted and applied in various regulated industries achieve regulatory compliance more efficiently. Based on the evaluation results, the proposed architecture can be applied in an industrial environment other than financial to be considered generic. Furthermore, an evaluation of the comparison of regulatory compliance business processes without and by implementing RegTech can produce a time efficiency of 95.16%. These results show that RegTech solutions can achieve regulatory compliance more efficiently.


Keywords


RegTech; Regulatory Technology; Regulatory Compliance; Solution Architecture; Generic Solution Architecture

References


J. von Solms, “Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury,” J. Bank. Regul., vol. 22, no. 2, hal. 152–168, 2020, doi: 10.1057/s41261-020-00134-0.

J. Du dan L. Wei, “An analysis of regulatory technology in the Internet financial sector in conjunction with the logit model,” Proc. - 2020 2nd Int. Conf. Econ. Manag. Model Eng. ICEMME 2020, hal. 428–431, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICEMME51517.2020.00091.

T. Butler dan L. O’Brien, “Understanding RegTech for Digital Regulatory Compliance,” Disrupting Financ., hal. 85–102, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_6.

J. von Solms, “Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury,” J. Bank. Regul., vol. 22, no. 3, hal. 191–207, 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41261-020-00138-w.

M. N. Kondratyeva, D. D. Svirina, dan A. I. Tsvetkov, “The role of information technologies in ensuring banking security,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1047, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1047/1/012069.

R. P. Buckley, D. W. Arner, D. A. Zetzsche, dan R. H. Weber, “The road to RegTech: the (astonishing) example of the European Union,” J. Bank. Regul., vol. 21, no. 1, hal. 26–36, 2020, doi: 10.1057/s41261-019-00104-1.

D. W. Arner, J. Nathan Barberis, dan R. Buckley, “FinTech and RegTech in a Nutshell, and the Future in a Sandbox,” no. October 2018, 2017, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3088303.

D. W. Arner, “FinTech , regTech , and the reconceptualization of financial regulation,” Northwest. J. Int. Law Business, Forthcoming, Univ. Hong Kong Fac. Law, no. January, 2017.

M. Becker, K. Merz, dan R. Buchkremer, “RegTech—the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice,” Intell. Syst. Accounting, Financ. Manag., vol. 27, no. 4, hal. 161–167, 2020, doi: 10.1002/isaf.1479.

B. Firmansyah dan A. A. Arman, “A Systematic Literature Review of RegTech: Technologies, Characteristics, and Architectures,” 2022 Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innov. ICITSI 2022 - Proc., hal. 310–315, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9970830.

A. D. Kristanto dan A. A. Arman, “Towards A Smart Regulatory Compliance, The Capabilities of RegTech and SupTech,” in 2022 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), 2022, hal. 300–309, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9970801.

E. Johansson, K. Sutinen, J. Lassila, V. Lang, M. Martikainen, dan O. M. Lehner, “RegTech-A Necessary Tool to Keep Up with Compliance and Regulatory Changes ?,” ACRN J. Financ. Risk Perspect., vol. 8, no. Digital Accounting, hal. 71–85, 2019.

P. Treleaven, J. Barnett, A. Knight, dan W. Serrano, “Real Estate Data Marketplace,” AI Ethics, vol. 1, no. 4, hal. 445–462, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00053-4.

C. Singh, L. Zhao, W. Lin, dan Z. Ye, “Can machine learning, as a RegTech compliance tool, lighten the regulatory burden for charitable organisations in the United Kingdom?,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 29, no. 1, hal. 45–61, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0131.

J. H. M. Bergmann, “The Emerging Field of Medical Regulatory Technology and Data Science,” Prosthesis, vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 169–171, 2022, doi: 10.3390/prosthesis4020017.

E. N. Lallas, I. Santouridis, G. Mountzouris, V. C. Gerogiannis, dan A. Karageorgos, “An SQWRL-Based Method for Assessing Regulatory Compliance in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 21, hal. 10923, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app122110923.

M. Turki, A. Hamdan, R. T. Cummings, A. Sarea, M. Karolak, dan M. Anasweh, “The regulatory technology ‘RegTech’ and money laundering prevention in Islamic and conventional banking industry,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 10, hal. e04949, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04949.

A. McSweeney, Introduction to Solution Architecture. Independently published (February 20, 2019), 2019.

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, dan S. Chatterjee, “A design science research methodology for information systems research,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, hal. 45–77, 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

C. Sonnenberg, “Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice,” vol. 7286, no. August 2014, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9.

K. Peffers, L. Vegas, M. A. Rothenberger, L. Vegas, T. Tuunanen, dan R. Vaezi, “Design Science Research Evaluation,” vol. 7286, no. July 2021, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9.

M. Lovatt, Solution Architecture Foundations. Swindon, United Kingdom: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, 2021.

The Open Group, The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2. The Open Group, 2018.

C. Gebayew dan A. A. Arman, “Modify TOGAF ADM for Government Enterprise Architecture: Case Study in Ethiopia,” Proceeding 2019 5th Int. Conf. Wirel. Telemat. ICWT 2019, hal. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICWT47785.2019.8978260.

J. Barberis, D. W. Arner, dan R. P. Buckley, The RegTech Book, The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaries in Regulation, vol. 4, no. 1. Wiley, 2019.

BIAN, “BIAN Service Landscape,” BIAN, 2023. bian.org.

A. Mahal, Business Process Management, Basics and Beyond. How works Get Done. Technics Publications, LLC, 2010.

M. Armbrust, A. Ghodsi, R. Xin, dan M. Zaharia, “Lakehouse : A New Generation of Open Platforms that Unify Data Warehousing and Advanced Analytics,” Conf. Innov. Data Syst. Res., 2021.

N. E. Janssen, “The Evolution of Data Storage Architectures : Examining the Value of the Data Lakehouse,” Master Thesis, University of Twente, 2022.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
ISSN 2089-3272

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

web analytics
View IJEEI Stats

503 Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

Additionally, a 503 Service Unavailable error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.