Comparative Analysis of Hardware Performance for Linear Detection in a Massive MIMO System on FPGA Using the Vivado HLS Tool

Nurulhuda Ismail, Mohamad Hairol Jabbar, Ariffuddin Joret, Norshidah Katiran, Eddy Irwan Shah Saadon

Abstract


This paper compares the performance of hardware implementation for linear detection in a massive MIMO system. The study focuses on Gram matrix inversion solved using two approaches: direct and indirect matrix inversion. Direct matrix inversion is represented by Cholesky Decomposition, while indirect matrix inversion is represented by the Neumann series and the Gauss-Seidel method. The algorithm for inversions, embedded in a C-based function, is virtually implemented on the FPGA using the Vivado HLS tool. The synthesis report categorizes the performance from the FPGA implementation into three parts: timing (ns), cycle latency, and resource utilization. With the same targeted time limit, indirect matrix inversion such as the Neumann series seems to be the fastest algorithm compared to the direct method due to the matrix-matrix multiplication approach. In terms of latency, NS requires more clock cycles to obtain the output compared to others.  Based on the results, the direct inversion method exhibits higher complexity, particularly in timing for clock frequency and resource utilization needed to complete the inversion

Keywords


massive MIMO; Linear Detection; Matrix inversion, FPGA, Vivado HLS

References


T. L. Marzetta and a N. Introduction, “Massive MIMO: An Introduction,” Bell Labs Tech. J., vol. 20, pp. 11–22, 2015, doi: 10.15325/BLTJ.2015.2407793.

J. Qian, “The analysis and implementation of FPGA for precoding in FFH-OFDM,” 2010 6th Int. Conf. Wirel. Commun. Netw. Mob. Comput. WiCOM 2010, pp. 0–3, 2010, doi: 10.1109/WICOM.2010.5601051.

P. O. Box and I. Ya, “DIRECT VERSUS ITERATIVE METHODS FOR FIXED-POINT IMPLEMENTATION OF MATRIX INVERSION Institute of Digital and Computer Systems , Tampere University of Technology”.

H. Prabhu, J. Rodrigues, O. Edfors, and F. Rusek, “Approximative matrix inverse computations for very-large MIMO and applications to linear pre-coding systems,” in 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Apr. 2013, pp. 2710–2715. doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2013.6554990.

X. Gao, L. Dai, J. Zhang, S. Han, C. L. I, and I. Chih-Lin, “Capacity-approaching linear precoding with low-complexity for large-scale MIMO systems,” IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., vol. 2015-Septe, pp. 1577–1582, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248549.

J. Minango and C. de Almeida, “A Low-Complexity Linear Precoding Algorithm Based on Jacobi Method for Massive MIMO Systems,” in 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Jun. 2018, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/VTCSpring.2018.8417575.

Xilinx, “Xilinx 7 series fpgas: breakthrough power and performance, dramatically reduced development time,” 2012, development time,” 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www.xilinx.com/publications/prod_mktg/7-Series-Product-Brief.pdf

A. Jennings, Matrix Computation for Engineers and Scientists. John Wiley and Sons, 1977.

G. Stewart, Matrix Algorithm: Basic Decompositions. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1998.

A. Krishnamoorthy and D. Menon, “Matrix Inversion Using Cholesky Decomposition,” CoRR, vol. abs/1111.4, no. 3, pp. 70–72, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4144

D. Koch, F. Hannig, and D. Ziener, FPGAs for software programmers. Springer, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26408-0.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
ISSN 2089-3272

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

web analytics
View IJEEI Stats

503 Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

Additionally, a 503 Service Unavailable error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.