Evaluation of Vector Font Rendering and Voice Recognition in Integrated Hearing Support Systems

Authors

K. Chun
Daegu Catholic University image/svg+xml
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v14i1.7516
Download PDF
Published: 14-02-2026 • Issue: Vol. 14 No. 1: March 2026 • Section: Regular paper

Abstract

This paper focuses on the implementation of core functionalities for a Hearing Support System (HSS) and the validation of its engineering feasibility. The system is designed to address the limitations of conventional hearing aids, specifically their restricted personalized calibration and environmental adaptation. The proposed HSS is a smartphone application-based system characterized by key functions: personalized settings derived from individual audiogram profiles, environment-specific presets, and real-time speech translation with textual display. Regarding the system's auxiliary output, the implementation of a Hangul (Korean) display is presented. A comparative analysis between a low-cost ESP32-based implementation (utilizing bitmap fonts) and a Raspberry Pi-based counterpart (employing vector fonts) empirically validates the necessity of vector fonts for enabling font scaling functions, which are crucial for users with low vision. For speech recognition, the study adopts an approach that transforms one-dimensional time-series audio waveforms into two-dimensional 'sound images,' specifically spectrograms, which serve as input for a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Conclusively, this research successfully prototyped the core functionalities of the HSS at a Proof of Concept (PoC) level, utilizing tools, thereby confirming its integration feasibility. Nevertheless, several key areas are identified as future tasks for practical deployment: the refinement of preset functionalities, the elimination of dependencies on external APIs, and fundamental enhancements to speech recognition performance through the adoption of deeper CNN architectures.
Keywords: HSS(Hearing Support System); Hangul Display; CNN; Deep Learning

References

Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A. World report on hearing. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.

Picou E. M. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing, New York, NY, USA: Thieme Med. Publishers, 2020; 41(01): 21–36.

Kates J. M., Arehart K. H. The hearing-aid audio quality index (HAAQI). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech Language Processing. 2016; 24(2): 354–365.

Richard J, Zimpfer V., Roth S. Comparison of objective and subjective methods for evaluating speech quality and intelligibility recorded through bone conduction and in-ear microphones. Applid Acoustics. 2023; 211. Art. No. 109576. [Online]. Available: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X23003742

Schröter H., Rosenkranz T., Escalante-B A. N., Maier A. Low latency speech enhancement for hearing aids using deep filtering. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Audio Speech Language Processing. 2022; 30: 2716–2728.

Kavalekalam M. S., Nielsen J. K., Boldt J. B., Christensen M. G. Model-based speech enhancement for intelligibility improvement in binaural hearing aids. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech Language Processing. 2019; 27(1): 99–113.

Eskimez S. E., Yoshioka T., Wang H., Wang X., Chen Z., Huang X. Personalized speech enhancement: New models and comprehensive evaluation. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Acoustic Speech Signal Processing. 2022; 356–360.

Deepa P., Khilar R. A Report on voice recognition system: techniques, methodologies and challenges using deep neural network. 2021 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT). 2021; 1–5.

Cayir A. N., Navruz T. S. Effect of Dataset Size on Deep Learning in Voice Recognition. 2021 3rd International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Roboltic Applications (IEEE HORA). 2021; 1–5.

[Mykhailichenko I., Ivashchenko H., Barkovska O., Liashenko O. Application of Deep Neural Network for realtime voice command recognition. 2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (IEEE KhPIWeek). 2022; 1-4.

[Cui F., Cui Q., Song Y. A Survey on learning-based approaches for modeling classification of human-machine dialog systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Network and Learning Systems. 2021; 32(4): 1418-1432.

[Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Zekveld A., Sörqvist P., Danielsson H., Lyxell B., Dahlström O., Signoret C., Stenfelt S., Pichora-Fuller MK., Rudner M. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2013.

[Hick C. B., Tharpe A. M. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2002; 45(3): 573-84.

[Pichora-Fuller M. K., Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification. 2006; 10(1): 29-59.

[Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998; 90(2), 312–320.

How to Cite

[1]
K. Chun, “Evaluation of Vector Font Rendering and Voice Recognition in Integrated Hearing Support Systems”, IJEEI, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.52549/ijeei.v14i1.7516.